At
some point, the virus will be controlled (at least, that is everyone’s daily prayer). I hope teachers around the world will then
pause for a moment to talk about what we have learned from having to switch so
abruptly to distance learning. There was
little time for planning, just a desperate rush to see what might work. When I hear my colleagues, they seem amazed
at how effectively certain tactics have succeeded. I want to hear about those discoveries. I want to learn from their epiphanies. I want to share in all of these new types of
learning.
Most of us got pushed out of our teaching rut in record time. What can we discover from the process that
ensued? With that in mind, I want to
write today about what I have tried over the past couple of weeks and why. It is too early to assess how well it has
worked but I have tried to do things that made sense to me. As I have explained to several friends who
are not educators, “This is like changing from playing football to playing
tennis. Going from face-to-face to
distance education is not about adapting.
It is about reinventing the process from the ground up without any time for
practice.”
My
approach is based on two personal influences.
First, when I was in the 9th grade in 1962, my little high
school put me into a self-study program where I was supposed to learn advanced
algebra by myself. I am sure it was cutting edge
education at the time. I was given a big
book that led me down a mathematical path – I would read a question, then read
an answer. I would read the next
question and then read the next answer, and so on. Day in and day out.
This
did not work for me at all. No way. I spent most of the time lost or about half
asleep. Nevertheless, even as a ninth
grader, I realized that it absolutely could have worked. The idea had merit but the implementation was
flawed.
--The
sequencing of the questions had to be extremely good. Because I had no teacher, each question needed
to lead naturally into the next one without a seam. If the questions were redundant, I got
bored. If the gap between questions was
too wide, I got lost. Occasionally, when
the questions were sequenced just perfectly, I could successfully navigate through some
complicated material by myself. Those
moments were neat.
--The
explanations had to be understandable to a ninth grader. The key educational point in the process was in the reading
of each answer. I was sure a high school teacher
would have understood the answers but this material was all new to me. I had to be able to read the words on the
page by myself and figure out what they meant.
I was 15 years old. If I could
not do that, I was stuck. Looking back,
I cannot imagine how important it was for those answers to be crystal clear to
a ninth grader.
--I
needed some type of frequent assessment to make sure I was not missing anything
and to encourage me to keep pushing on. The
questions and answers could quickly seem endless without some kind of quiz or
other assignment to make sure I was learning what I was supposed to learn. The path could just get too long too quickly.
For me, it really did look like an
endless highway.
I
left ninth grade algebra thinking, “Well, that could have worked, but it didn’t.”
Fast
forward more than 30 years to the mid-1990s.
Two friends and I invented a self-study course for the CPA Exam titled, “90
Days to Success on the CPA Exam.” We had
no employees, it was just a hobby for us.
Within a couple of years, we were selling our programs in 50 states and
35 other countries. We eventually sold
the business because it was beginning to overwhelm us.
But,
I learned a lot more about distance learning from the experience.
--The
“students” needed structure. They wanted
to wake up and know what they were supposed to do without having to think about it. We furnished a daily calendar that said, “Today
– do this.”
--Everything
we did in this program was based on sequential learning. When there is no teacher present, the
learning cannot look random (but I had already learned that in the ninth
grade).
--The
students liked to have different types of learning experiences. If they did the same thing every day, they
got bored and lost their focus.
--The
process needed to be interactive. The
students needed a lot of feedback or they would mentally drift away. Everything we created required them to give a
response that would be assessed.
--The
students needed encouragement. They were
human. They needed someone to tell them,
“You can do this. I know it can be
discouraging at times and frustrating but, if you will do what I ask you to do,
you ARE going to learn this material and be successful. Believe in yourself.”
So, back
in March, when I came back from visiting New Orleans over Spring Break (luckily, without
the virus) and was told that we were switching to distance learning, I tried to
incorporate what I learned in the ninth grade in 1962 with my 1990s distance
learning program.
I teach two classes on Intermediate Accounting II and one class of Financial
Accounting. The first is extremely
complex and has 39 college juniors. The
second is an introductory course with 25 college frosh. Two entirely different levels of material.
The
first thing I did was choose not to use Zoom or any other “live”
presentations. I have no problems if
someone finds that approach works well for them but I could not see me explaining
complex accounting problems using some type of online “live” program. I hope one day to see how it can be used successfully but, until then, I have doubts about it working well for me. I thought the same thing even after watching
Saturday Night Live.
It
is impossible for me to explain exactly what I did but I will try to describe my
process as best as I can. The material was
not always presented in exactly this format but almost. If you would like to see some of these materials,
please send me a note at Jhoyle@richmond.edu.
1 – I
started this whole process with a note to my students ensuring they that they
were going to learn this material. I never wanted them to have a doubt.
2 - My first assignment was that they needed to spend a certain amount of
time for class every day—60-75 minutes for financial accounting and 90 minutes
for Intermediate Accounting II—and I wanted them to keep a “time journal” just
so they could track their efforts. I
figured if I could get a good amount of their time using effective materials,
the chances were high for a successful learning experience. I did everything I could to get a “buy-in”
from the students right from the start.
3 - I
emailed them about 10-15 questions that I believed would sequentially lead the
students into our first topic. I wrote
the questions and then immediately wrote those same questions but this time with
my answers. I explained to my students
what I wanted them to do, “Read all the questions and then read all the answers. Then, go back and read the questions a second
time and this time try to answer them for yourself. Read the answers again. Go back and read the questions for a third
time and see if you can get them all correct.
Keep following this loop until you are comfortable.” I suggested that they needed to have this “Q
& A list” under control in a reasonable but specific period of time. From my experience, college students need
deadlines.
4 –
The next day I sent them a second group of 10-15 questions and answers that
followed up on the first batch. I am
trying to structure these Q & A lists in chunks that are not
overwhelming. A bit like Goldilocks, I
wanted them to face new information that was not too little but also not too
big.
5 –
The next day I emailed them a practice problem, “If you have been successful
with our first two Q & A lists, then I think you can work the following problem. The answers are at the end. If I don’t hear from you by (insert time and
date), I’ll assume you got the correct answers and have this material under
control. If you cannot get my answers,
drop me an email and I’ll give you a push or send you the computations.” I make sure this practice problem is not easy
but is a natural progression from the materials covered in the Q & A lists. Everything hinges on that sequential process.
6 –
The next day I posted one or two Panopto videos on Blackboard. (I imagine that a lot of people who had never
heard of Panopto last month are now experts.)
First, I sent the students a rather complicated problem or two and told
them to work them before watching the video.
Working a problem they have not seen has limited benefit in my
mind. I put as much relevant material
as possible on a Power Point presentation and use Panopto to walk through those
slides. I want my students to hear my
voice explaining how to work each step in the process.
I’m not a technical person so my slides are very basic but I’m not sure
that basic is not a good foundation for learning.
I give the students a time frame for watching the videos. I can check the numbers who have done so and
will send encouragement if not enough are taking advantage of the videos.
7 – During the
next day or so, I post an “effort quiz” on Blackboard. It is short and should take 15-30
minutes. I use a lot of multiple-choice
and true-false because I think they work well when you are focused on sequential
learning. I typically send the students
some basic information in advance and tell them that the questions will be
based off that information. I want them
to spend time looking and thinking about the information prior to opening up
the quiz. I am trying to avoid surprises. I set a reasonably low number
as a “Good Effort” grade. As long as most
students can hit that standard, we move on.
I am not seeking perfection.
8 –
After we have gone through 2 or 3 groups of material looping through the above steps, I post
a “Final Quiz” on Blackboard. It is about 20-40 minutes. It has a
bit more weight and more complexity than the “effort quizzes” but I try to make
sure that it covers what my materials have covered. I like the term “Final Quiz” because it indicates to the students that
they have successfully mastered a section of material.
What
do I like about this approach?
a. It is structured. The students always know what they are
supposed to do next.
b. It has time recommendations. The students know how long they are supposed
to be spending each day.
c. It has deadlines. Students know when assignments are due.
d. It is sequential. Everything is based on those Q & A
lists. If I can write them well enough,
then all of the other steps tie back into that information. To an educator, I cannot stress that enough.
e. I try to use several types of learning: Q & A lists, practice problems, videos,
effort quizzes, final quizzes. Each one
has its own particular purpose. Each one
requires the student to do something.
They cannot be passive learners.
f. I use a lot of email so I can provide
encouragement. Many of my students are
struggling with issues that go well beyond school.
There is a lot of strain and tension in their lives. I am not a cheerleader but I do want them to
know every single day that I believe they can learn this material and that we will all get
through it successfully just as soon as possible.
What
do the students think? What I think is
probably unimportant. It is what the
students think and accomplish that matters.
After the semester is over, I certainly plan to ask them some honest
questions to see what I can learn from this experiment. Why go through all of this if I am not
going to learn how to get better? But
that will have to wait. That is why I am
so interested in hearing what others are doing. Let's learn from each other.